Prefers AI-Generated Content So Game Those Ubiquitous AI Assessments By Having AI Write Your Materials If You Dare

A new trend is emerging as organizations increasingly use generative AI and large language models to score written submissions such as resumes and research papers. Studies cited in the article suggest AI often gives higher marks to content written by AI or other similar systems, while carefully handwritten work can receive lower scores. That creates a dilemma: follow rules against AI assistance and risk scoring worse, or use AI to rewrite material to improve chances, even as detection tools can misfire and lead to disqualification. The author frames it as a “cat-and-mouse” problem and calls for organizations to address bias in AI assessments.