Who Will Protect Workers From AI Algorithms?

A Canadian opinion piece argues regulators and lawmakers should treat AI-driven workplace surveillance and algorithmic management as psychosocial hazards before harm accumulates. It notes that monitoring tools aren’t new—security cameras, keystroke loggers, and screen-time monitoring have long existed—but AI introduces more intrusive and controlling systems. The author says Canadian court decisions involving AI-enabled algorithmic management and worker psychosocial safety are surprisingly limited. While Canadian OHS laws define hazards broadly and psychosocial hazards are generally included, AI-enabled algorithmic management isn’t explicitly addressed in national standards like CSA Z1003-13 or in provincial and territorial OHS regulations. The article also highlights a “self-perpetuating” legal gap: without precedent, harms are harder to litigate, limiting future clarity.